top of page

Forum Comments

Any Comments on the Activity Level of VARAC vs JS8call
In VarAC - HF discussion forum
Albert Kleyn
Sep 04, 2024
939fly & Gary JS8CALL is a great digital application. HOWEVER... Jordon does not seem to actively update JS8CALL anymore ?? ( as opposed to Irad, the VARAC author) and his bunch of helpers. There are 3 types of digital operators, as I see it: 1. Diehard folks like Gary and several others, they have real QSO's with others and probably run their station 24/7, are always there to help and advise others. 2. FT8 ops.... 5-9 QRZ Computer to Computer with a bit of human on the side. 3. People who want to have real QSO's but cannot do so for one reason of the other. ( I am in that category). See MY QRZ page for an explanation. Nutshell: working unpaid 80 hrs per week 52 weeks per year, running an animal sanctuary. Short of stopping eating..sleeping and going to the toilet, there is NO time for radio, last real holliday 1995, took grandchilderen to Disneyworld in FL. JS8CALL is a wonderful app, but as you notice with both JS8 & VARAC.. the beacon to CQ ration would be 90-1. In my case see (3) above for the reason. I now seldom beacon to avoid annoying folks. JS8CALL documentation is poor, compared to VARAC which is wonderfully documented. VARAC is feature rich... and continues to be enhanced by Irad at every opportunity. Do note that both modes differ in application...ARQ versus XXX... (can't remember name of other mode). Where JS8CALL shines is in it "Who has heard me" implementation. * Where FT8 and derivites shines (sadly) ... QSO after QSO with no effort. Suits many ops down to a T. Folks, this is my 2 cents worth, As our cousins may say: Your opions may differ. Albert EI7II.
0
0
VarAC: A Lifeline in Emergency Situations
In VarAC EmComm discussion forum
Remote modem AFC data
In Feature requests
Introducing SNR-colours in "CQ" and (maybe) the "Beacon" window
In Feature requests
Forum Comments: Members_Page

Albert Kleyn

More actions
bottom of page